Evolution v. Creationism: politics, science, the debate (2 of 3)

A panel discussion exploring the politics and science to creationism v. evolution debate, presented by the American Humanist Association. The panel has designated experts leads the discussion: Eugenie Scott, Ph.D., Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education and author of Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction and co-editor of Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design is Wrong for our Schools, Barbara Forrest, Ph.D., professor of philosophy atSoutheastern Louisiana University, Expert for the plaintiff in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, and co-author of Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design, and Kenneth Miller, Ph.D., professor of biology at Brown University, lead reviewer for Kitzmiller v. Dover plaintiffs in the Area School District, and author of Finding Darwin God: A Scientist in the search for common ground between God and evolution, and only a theory: evolution and the struggle forAmerica's soul. Fred Edwords, communications director of the United coalition of reason and the former editor of the Creation / Evolution journal, moderated.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P79x03zcEU&hl=en

See Also : Alarm Chronograph Watches car monitor Pomegranate Juice

Evolution v. Creationism: the Politics, the Science, the Debate (3 of 3)

A panel discussion exploring the politics and science surrounding the evolution v. creationism debate, presented by the American Humanist Association. The panel features renowned experts leading the discussion: Eugenie Scott, Ph.D., executive director of the National Center for Science Education and author of Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction and co-editor of Not in Our Classrooms: Why Intelligent Design is Wrong for Our Schools, Barbara Forrest, Ph.D., professor of philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University, expert witness for the plaintiff in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, and co-author of Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design, and Kenneth Miller, Ph.D., professor of biology at Brown University, lead expert witness for the plaintiff in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, and author of Finding Darwin's God: A Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution and Only a Theory: Evolution and the Battle for America's Soul. Fred Edwords, communications director of the United Coalition of Reason and former editor of the Creation/Evolution journal, moderates.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnP2cMsvkoM&hl=en

Visit : Best Price depreciation tax Public Liability Insurance

School Bus Seat Belt Safety Debate

Across the country have passed laws that require drivers and passengers of both commercial and private vehicles for their safety while in the car buckle. These laws were designed to protect the occupants of the vehicle in the event of a collision, but was not enacted such a law on safety belts in school buses. This seems shocking, considering that 60% of the people involved in automobile collision serious injury experience, not to mention the growingNumber of motor vehicle collisions resulting from each year. This issue raises the question: If we legislate to protect children in regular cars, why should we not do the same for school buses?

The question seems surprisingly difficult to solve and has been controversial for many years. Proponents of the installation of seat belts in school buses indicates that children are required to wear seat belts when in a car driven by her parents, so it only makes sense that they should be obliged to bear,a seat belt while driving in a bus driven by another adult. The National Coalition for School Bus Safety has fought for stricter regulation for many years and was successful in some respects. Adopted in 1987, adopted rules requiring New York's "lap-belts on all new school buses and became the first state to the school bus seat belt safety laws. New Jersey and Florida soon followed by similar laws and adopted soon after New York. California and in the ongoing argument for the seat was involvedBelt and passed a bill that required the use of three-point or shoulder belts for all new buses.

Opponents used seat belts in school buses carried out a study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to prove their point. The study found that two-point seat belts or lap belt, actually increases the risk of neck and abdominal injuries in an accident. Shoulder straps fared slightly better, showing benefit for safety if worn properly. The opponents of the school bus seat beltRight to argue that children are not likely to wear shoulder belts properly, making them inefficient to adequately protect the children.

Security aside, both advocates and opponents of such a system must also examine the economic costs of installation of seat belts in school buses. It is estimated that California would cost three-point belt law schools, an extra $ 1,500 to $ 1,800 per vehicle. Some people worry that higher prices can take school buses putmore children of bus service since some schools will do just not in a position to so many safety-equipped buses.

Accidents involving large vehicles such as buses have the potential to cause serious injury if involved. If you or someone you love has been a victim of a bus accident, it is important that you contact an attorney liaison to discuss your rights. An experienced bus accident lawyer can help you organize effective action against those who have caused you. harm

Thanks To : lcd carmonitors mesothelioma lawsuits diver watches